Startup Formation Lawyer for Growth Companies

Services

Business Formation & Start-Up

We advise founders at the earliest and most fragile stage of company formation, where decisions feel administrative but quietly determine future leverage, ownership, and control.

Our work at formation focuses on creating structures that remain intact as companies raise capital, add shareholders, and scale.

Incorporation is the starting point. Formation is the foundation.

Next steps

→ Book a Strategy Call

→ Start With the Launch Plan

→ View Workflow Kits

What We Mean by “Formation”

Formation is not paperwork.

It is the initial legal architecture of a company: how ownership is issued, earned, protected, and aligned before external capital enters the picture. Decisions made at formation determine whether a company is investable, whether founder relationships are durable, and whether later financing terms land cleanly or expose hidden weaknesses.

Most structural problems that surface in financings or exits originate here — not because founders made “bad” decisions, but because they were not shown how early choices compound.

Our role is to ensure that foundational decisions are made with downstream consequences in mind.

When Formation Work Matters Most

Formation work is most critical at moments when companies are moving quickly but have limited margin for error.

Pre-Incorporation

Before the company legally exists, founders must decide:

how ownership will be allocated,
whether multiple share classes are required,
and how control will be exercised from day one.

Errors at this stage are difficult to unwind later.

Post-Incorporation, Pre-Financing

Many companies incorporate quickly and defer structural work. This is the most common failure point.

At this stage, formation work focuses on:

correcting founder equity alignment,
formalizing vesting and reverse vesting,
securing IP ownership,
and cleaning the cap table before investors review it.

Core Formation Focus Areas

Our formation work centers on four interdependent areas.

Founder Equity & Alignment

Founder equity is not just about percentages. It is about:

how equity is issued,
how it vests,
what happens on departure,
and how disputes are resolved.

Poorly aligned founder equity creates leverage for investors later and instability within the team.

Further analysis: shares, share classes, and economic rights

Vesting & Reverse Vesting

Vesting is not a compensation concept. It is a risk-allocation mechanism.

We structure vesting to:

protect the company if a founder leaves,
avoid punitive forfeiture outcomes,
and remain compatible with future financings and option plans.

Further analysis: restricted shares and the illusion of ownership

Intellectual Property Ownership

IP must belong cleanly and unambiguously to the company.

We address:

founder IP assignment,
contractor and developer IP,
gaps created by pre-incorporation work,
and documentation that will be reviewed in financing and M&A diligence.

Unclear IP ownership is one of the fastest ways to derail a financing.

Cap Table Foundations

The cap table is the single record that reconciles:

At formation, we focus on:

issuing equity correctly,
avoiding phantom ownership,
and ensuring the cap table reflects reality — not assumptions.

This includes the initial corporate records, resolutions, and approvals required to ensure issuances and vesting are legally effective and defensible.

Further analysis: how investors read early cap tables

Our Approach

We treat formation as structural engineering, not document assembly.

Our work typically includes:

diagnosing founder dynamics and future scenarios,
designing equity and vesting structures that survive stress,
aligning IP ownership with economic reality,
documenting decisions in a form that can withstand diligence.

Where appropriate, we explain how formation decisions will be interpreted later by:

investors,
boards,
and acquirers.

The goal is not to optimize for speed alone, but to preserve optionality.

Formation and Future Financing

Most financing friction arises from formation shortcuts.

Examples include:

unclear founder vesting,
undocumented IP contributions,
informal equity splits,
and cap tables that do not reflect earned ownership.

These issues rarely disappear. They are priced, exploited, or corrected on investor terms.

For that reason, we view formation as inseparable from financing readiness, even though no financing documents are signed at this stage.

Common Founder Mistakes

We regularly see founders:

treat incorporation as the end of formation,
defer equity and vesting decisions until “later,”
assume IP ownership is obvious without documentation,
underestimate how closely early structure is scrutinized.

Formation mistakes are rarely fatal immediately — but they are almost always expensive later.

How Clients Engage Us

We support founders from initial formation through early growth, with engagement tailored to complexity, speed, and future fundraising.

Common engagement paths include:

incorporation and organizational structuring,
founder equity alignment and early governance setup,
implementation of IP ownership and assignment frameworks,
preparation for initial fundraising or strategic partnerships.
bespoke advisory or transactional engagements tailored to the specific mandate,
ongoing advisory support as the business evolves.

For clients seeking clarity and predictability at the outset, we also offer:

Workflow kits offering curated bundles of essential legal documents
Structured legal plans designed to support companies at specific stages of growth.

We tailor the engagement to the company’s stage and objectives. Depending on stage and complexity, this work may be delivered through bespoke engagements or coordinated with structured legal plans and workflow kits.

Next steps

→ Book a Strategy Call

→ Start with the Launch Plan

→ View Workflow Kits

Related Insights

Our formation work is informed by extensive analysis of early-stage structure and its downstream effects, including:

These insights reflect how formation decisions are evaluated in practice, not in theory.

Closing

Formation decisions rarely feel decisive when they are made.

Their consequences surface later — during financings, disputes, or exits — when leverage has shifted.

We help founders get formation right so they are not forced to fix it under pressure.

Next steps

→ Start with the Launch Plan

A Software Publisher company in Toronto in a CA$10 million capital restructuring, including a CA$4.5 million convertible note and SAFE notes, ensuring a compliant, investor-friendly framework to support the Company’s growth and future equity conversion.
A Canadian AI startup in securing CA$5 million in funding round, achieving a CA$20 million post-money valuation! This milestone paves the way for the startup’s expansion into new geographical locations and involvement in multi-billion dollar real estate projects.
Aviation Company: Led the successful acquisition of strategic intellectual property for revolutionary single-engine helicopters and UAV systems, backed by a UAE venture capital.
Meridian Credit Union, a leading financial institution in Toronto, in a share subscription transaction in FinTech Startup that includes legal due diligence, software licensing, drafting of transactional documents and securities law compliance on matters such as private issuer and exemptions from prospectus.
Motusbank, a federally chartered online bank in Toronto, in standardizing the terms and conditions of the bank’s cloud-based services, including Saas agreements, software licensing agreements, click-wrap agreements, and other technology-related agreements for the use of the bank’s online users.
Fincantieri, the largest naval shipbuilding group in the world, in naval ship IP design agreements, transfer of technology and licensing agreements negotiated and signed with several armed forces in the Middle East region to protect Fincantiari’s intellectual property rights.
Infrastructure Ontario‘s Request for Proposal Documents (RFPs) of the Go-Rail Expansion Project.
Infrastructure Ontario‘s Go-Rail Expansion project agreement, a single fully integrated contract using the Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain (DBFOM) model.
Infrastructure Ontario’s Transit Oriented Communities (TOC) project agreements including term sheets, joint ventures, construction lease and option agreements with developers to jointly build mixed-use developments as part of Ontario Line subway project.
Infrastructure Ontario‘s Real estate matters such as expropriations/ collect and compete, land acquisition and disposition.
Jordan Aviation’s major shareholder in an airline company, to conclude a US$10 million share acquisition transaction.
Jordan Aviation, in its set-up of an aviation fund of US$30 million. Established fund company, management and sponsor companies. Prepared investment management agreement and subscription agreement. Moreover, drafted dry lease contracts for aircrafts as part of the fund transaction.
Fincantieri, in the negotiation of a joint venture transaction with Al Zamil Shipyard in KSA for the design and construction of several offshore vessels and building of facilities for military and offshore vessels in the new King Abdul Aziz Port in KSA.
National Holding, in the acquisition by a German firm (Knauf) to 51% stake in National Holding’s subsidiary.
National Holding, in a joint venture transaction with Vivartia, a Greek holding group based in Athens.
National Holding, in a US$36 million acquisition by Qatari sovereign wealth fund to National Holding’s shares in a Steel Factory in Egypt.
National Holding, in a US$40 million capitalization in a home appliances factory in Jordan, with ownership restructuring.
Dubai Bank and Dubai Holding, a global conglomerate and sovereign wealth fund of the government of Dubai and its ruling family, in producing a due diligence report and structuring advise in respect of a US$300 million cross-border acquisition/ privatization in a state-owned Jordanian Bank.
Dubai Holding in producing four separate legal due diligence reports with respect to acquisition transactions totaling close to US$200 million in Eastern investment group holding UK, International Energy Management Company, Jordan Airline Training and Simulation (JATS) and Jordanian Flight and Catering Services Company (Subsidiary of Alpha Co. -UK);
Kuwait National Bank in producing a due diligence report with respect to acquisition transaction in Bank Al Etihad in Jordan.
National Holding, in several international procurement and sale of goods contracts and trade between countries that involved contract drafting and other banking documentations such as letter of credits, bank guarantees and other documents for shipping and handling of goods based on Incoterms Rules.
Fincantieri as part of the in-house legal team, in closing a US$5.6 billion naval shipbuilding contract signed with the Qatari Navy in 2016.
Fincantieri as part of the in-house legal team, in the negotiation of US$ multi-billion procurement contracts, to equip and arm newly ordered warships, with suppliers such as Airbus, Raytheon, MBDA, Rolls-Royce, Thales and Leonardo.
Eagle Hills, a leading real estate developer, in several hotels operation agreements with Marriott Inc to license the operation of several (5) stars hotels and resorts in the Middle East region including St. Regis Hotel and residences, W Hotel & Residences and Westin Hotel.
Engie, a French multinational power company, to structure the set- up and finance of a 150 MW solar power project in Jordan.
Fincantieri, in closing a complex “Engineering, Procurement and Construction” contract for a military shipyard in the UAE and related joint venture contract for the management and operation.
Fincantieri in a US$250 million refitting contracts of naval units (ISS, FOS, ILS) with several naval forces in the Middle East.
National Holding, in several international procurement and sale of goods contracts and trade between countries that involved banking arrangements such as letter of credits, bank guarantees and other documents for shipping and handling goods.
National Holding in the setup, design and construction of Greenfield cable factory in Algeria.
Damac Properties in providing contract drafting to construction, consultancy, plot and unit SPA related to US$ multi-billion real estate projects in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, KSA and the UK based on FIDIC, NEC and bespoke forms of contract.
Damac Properties as part of the inhouse legal team, in the negotiation of a US$ 250 million construction contract with Arabtec Holding to construct Damac’s 90 floors tower (Ocean Heights in Dubai Marina) in Dubai, UAE.

What are the principal pros and cons of forming a federal corporation in Canada?

Pros

Incorporation under the Canada Business Corporations Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-44 (CBCA) provides the following advantages:

A CBCA corporation can carry on business as of right across Canada. This includes the right to enter and carry-on business in any Canadian province or territory under its corporate name (section 15(2), CBCA).
CBCA incorporation provides a common legal platform known throughout Canada (with the greatest recognition internationally).
The CBCA includes a highly flexible statutory arrangement provision (section 192, CBCA).
The CBCA no longer contains financial assistance restrictions (whether related-party or share purchase).

About 50% of the largest 200 non-financial corporations in Canada are incorporated under the CBCA.

Cons

Incorporation under the CBCA has the following disadvantages:

At least 25% of the directors must be resident Canadians (section 105(3), CBCA). A higher proportion applies in some industries (section 105(3.1), CBCA).
A CBCA corporation does not qualify for flow-through treatment under the US Internal Revenue Code.
The CBCA prohibits a:
Subsidiary from acquiring shares in its parent corporation.
Parent corporation from allowing its subsidiary to hold shares in the parent.
Unless it obtains an exemption from the Director under section 151(1) of the CBCA, a CBCA corporation must solicit proxies if it has more than 50 registered shareholders even if it is not a reporting issuer.

What are the principal pros and cons of forming a corporation in Ontario?

Pros

Incorporation under the Ontario Business Corporations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. B.16 (OBCA) provides the following advantages:

It is generally easier to clear a corporate name under the OBCA than under the Canada Business Corporations Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-44 (CBCA).
OBCA incorporation avoids the additional cost of filing an annual return under the CBCA (although the annual return may be filed electronically under the CBCA for only $20 a year).
A CBCA corporation must solicit proxies where it has more than 50 registered shareholders (while an OBCA non-offering corporation is not required to solicit proxies regardless of the number of registered shareholders).
Professional corporations for lawyers, paralegals, public accountants, medical doctors, dentists, veterinarians and social workers practicing in Ontario are only available under the OBCA.
The OBCA no longer contains financial assistance restrictions (whether related-party or share purchase).

Cons

Incorporation under the OBCA has the following disadvantages:

Incorporation under the OBCA offers little name protection within, and no name protection outside, Ontario.
The incorporation fee for articles of incorporation filed electronically under the OBCA is $300 (compared with $200 to file electronically under the CBCA).
Like a CBCA corporation, an OBCA corporation does not qualify for flow-through treatment under the US Internal Revenue Code. Only Alberta, British Columbia and Nova Scotia have types of unlimited liability corporations that qualify.
At least 25% of the members of the board of directors must be resident Canadian as defined in the OBCA (section 118(3), OBCA), which is also the minimum requirement under the CBCA but not under the laws of the territories and several sister provinces including British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Québec).
Except in rare circumstances, the OBCA prohibits:
- a subsidiary from acquiring shares in its parent corporation; or
- a parent corporation from allowing a subsidiary to hold its shares.

Are there any limits on the classes or series of shares that can be issued?

Corporations cannot generally impose restrictions on the issue of shares of any class or series, unless the restrictions are authorized by its articles. However, a unanimous shareholder agreement may impose controls on the issue of shares

Shares of series of the same class must participate ratably in respect of the payment of arrears of cumulative dividends, declared non-cumulative dividends and return of capital on dissolution or liquidation, if these claims are not paid in full (section 25(2) and (3), Business Corporations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. B.16). Any other restrictions on a class or series of shares must be set out in the articles or a unanimous shareholder agreement.

Choosing a Form of Ownership for Your Business: What You Need to Know

March 4, 2021 Khaled El Fauri

We advise founders at the earliest and most fragile stage of company formation, where decisions feel administrative but quietly determine future leverage, ownership, and control. Our work at formation focuses on creating...

What Happens When a Business Needs Money?

March 3, 2021 Khaled El Fauri

Why Should Startup Founders Consider Signing These Intellectual Property Agreements At The Outset of Their Business Journey?

September 24, 2021 Khaled El Fauri

Choosing the Right Legal Structure for Your Business in Canada: Pros and Cons of Sole Proprietorship, Partnership, Corporation, and Limited Partnership.

April 30, 2023 Khaled El Fauri