Business formation is the first structural decision a company makes. The way an entity is formed affects ownership, governance, taxation, and future financing. We advise founders and private companies on forming businesses with clean legal architecture designed for growth.
Our focus is practical structuring that avoids future friction and prepares companies for investment and scale.
What Proper Formation Should Achieve
Effective business formation should:
- Establish clear ownership and governance
- Align structure with tax and financing objectives
- Protect founders through proper documentation
- Create a scalable corporate framework
- Reduce the need for costly restructuring later
We prioritize clarity, efficiency, and long-term usability.
Core Areas We Structure
Incorporation and Entity Structuring
We structure entities based on ownership dynamics and long-term strategy, not default templates.
Typical work includes:
- Federal and provincial incorporations
- Share structure design
- Founder share issuance
- Organizational resolutions
- Initial corporate records
View Full Scope & Optional Add-Ons
Founder and Ownership Frameworks
We establish early ownership frameworks that prevent disputes and support growth.
Common structures include:
- Founders’ agreements.
- Initial shareholders’ agreements.
- Vesting frameworks.
- Equity incentive planning.
- Governance foundations.
Formation Readiness and Compliance
We ensure companies are legally organized and ready to operate.
This often includes:
- Corporate record setup.
- Regulatory registrations.
- Initial compliance frameworks.
- IP and employment documentation.
- Operational readiness.
Already Incorporated? Completing Your Founder Structure
Many founders incorporate their company independently but delay formal share issuance, and organizational documents. Without proper founder structuring, ownership, governance (shareholders agreement or founders agreement), and intellectual property foundations remain incomplete — creating risk during financing and diligence.
Our Startup Workflow Kit is designed to complete this early legal architecture. It formalizes founder share issuance and governance through professionally prepared agreements, establishing clean ownership structures that align with venture expectations. This allows self-incorporated companies to transition quickly into an institutional-ready framework.
Explore Startup Workflow Kit →
Our Practical Approach
We structure formations through a disciplined process:
- Understanding the company’s objectives and ownership.
- Designing entity and share structures.
- Implementing formation documentation.
- Establishing governance foundations.
- Preparing for future financing.
The result is a clean corporate platform built to scale.
Companies That Engage Our Formation Practice
We advise:
- New startups and founder teams
- Private companies restructuring ownership
- International founders entering Canada
- Venture-backed formations
- Businesses preparing for investment
Related Services
Business formation integrates closely with:
- Founders’ and shareholders’ agreements.
- Venture financing.
- Advisory and governance counsel.
- Intellectual property and technology.
A Formation Structure Designed for Growth
Strong formation decisions reduce risk and support long-term scalability. We design practical legal foundations that companies can build on with confidence.
Start With a Free Strategy Call
Complete a short intake and we’ll review your situation.
Representative Experience
Our experience includes complex corporate and transactional mandates involving multi-party negotiations, layered capital structures, and cross-border execution. Representative matters include:
- advising on a CAD $2M equity financing for a Toronto-based cybersecurity company.
- structuring a CAD $4.5M convertible note financing for a Canadian technology startup.
- advising on a USD $5M cross-border equity financing involving international venture structuring.
- managing a USD $100M+ ownership restructuring of a venture-led, government-backed aerospace project
Across these engagements, our focus is durability — ensuring that each transaction remains structurally coherent through future financings, governance evolution, and exit scenarios.
What are the principal pros and cons of forming a federal corporation in Canada?
Pros
Incorporation under the Canada Business Corporations Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-44 (CBCA) provides the following advantages:
- A CBCA corporation can carry on business as of right across Canada. This includes the right to enter and carry-on business in any Canadian province or territory under its corporate name (section 15(2), CBCA).
- CBCA incorporation provides a common legal platform known throughout Canada (with the greatest recognition internationally).
- The CBCA includes a highly flexible statutory arrangement provision (section 192, CBCA).
- The CBCA no longer contains financial assistance restrictions (whether related-party or share purchase).
About 50% of the largest 200 non-financial corporations in Canada are incorporated under the CBCA.
Cons
Incorporation under the CBCA has the following disadvantages:
- At least 25% of the directors must be resident Canadians (section 105(3), CBCA). A higher proportion applies in some industries (section 105(3.1), CBCA).
- A CBCA corporation does not qualify for flow-through treatment under the US Internal Revenue Code.
- The CBCA prohibits a:
- Subsidiary from acquiring shares in its parent corporation.
- Parent corporation from allowing its subsidiary to hold shares in the parent.
- Unless it obtains an exemption from the Director under section 151(1) of the CBCA, a CBCA corporation must solicit proxies if it has more than 50 registered shareholders even if it is not a reporting issuer.
What are the principal pros and cons of forming a corporation in Ontario?
Pros
Incorporation under the Ontario Business Corporations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. B.16 (OBCA) provides the following advantages:
- It is generally easier to clear a corporate name under the OBCA than under the Canada Business Corporations Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-44 (CBCA).
- OBCA incorporation avoids the additional cost of filing an annual return under the CBCA (although the annual return may be filed electronically under the CBCA for only $20 a year).
- A CBCA corporation must solicit proxies where it has more than 50 registered shareholders (while an OBCA non-offering corporation is not required to solicit proxies regardless of the number of registered shareholders).
- Professional corporations for lawyers, paralegals, public accountants, medical doctors, dentists, veterinarians and social workers practicing in Ontario are only available under the OBCA.
- The OBCA no longer contains financial assistance restrictions (whether related-party or share purchase).
Cons
Incorporation under the OBCA has the following disadvantages:
- Incorporation under the OBCA offers little name protection within, and no name protection outside, Ontario.
- The incorporation fee for articles of incorporation filed electronically under the OBCA is $300 (compared with $200 to file electronically under the CBCA).
- Like a CBCA corporation, an OBCA corporation does not qualify for flow-through treatment under the US Internal Revenue Code. Only Alberta, British Columbia and Nova Scotia have types of unlimited liability corporations that qualify.
- At least 25% of the members of the board of directors must be resident Canadian as defined in the OBCA (section 118(3), OBCA), which is also the minimum requirement under the CBCA but not under the laws of the territories and several sister provinces including British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Québec).
- Except in rare circumstances, the OBCA prohibits:
- a subsidiary from acquiring shares in its parent corporation; or
- a parent corporation from allowing a subsidiary to hold its shares.
Are there any limits on the classes or series of shares that can be issued?
Corporations cannot generally impose restrictions on the issue of shares of any class or series, unless the restrictions are authorized by its articles. However, a unanimous shareholder agreement may impose controls on the issue of shares
Shares of series of the same class must participate ratably in respect of the payment of arrears of cumulative dividends, declared non-cumulative dividends and return of capital on dissolution or liquidation, if these claims are not paid in full (section 25(2) and (3), Business Corporations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. B.16). Any other restrictions on a class or series of shares must be set out in the articles or a unanimous shareholder agreement.